devterРазвитие территорийTerritory Development2412-8945Сибирский институт управления10.32324/2412-8945-2021-3-28-37devter-167Research ArticleЭКОНОМИЧЕСКИЕ ИССЛЕДОВАНИЯECONOMIC RESEARCHСОЦИАЛЬНАЯ ОТВЕТСТВЕННОСТЬ КОМПАНИЙ: МОТИВАЦИЯ, ТЕНДЕНЦИИ И ПЕРСПЕКТИВЫCORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY: MOTIVATION, TRENDS AND PROSPECTSСоловейТ. Н.SoloveyT. N.

Татьяна Николаевна Соловей, кандидат экономических наук, доцент кафедры экономической теории и социальной политики

Санкт-Петербург

Tatyana N. Solovey, Candidate of Economic Sciences, Associate Professor of the Department of Economic Theory and Social Policy

Saint Petersburg

t.solovey@spbu.ruСанкт-Петербургский государственный университетSt Petersburg (State) University20212310202103 (25)2837Copyright © Соловей Т.Н., 20212021Соловей Т.Н.Solovey T.N.Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.https://devter.elpub.ru/jour/article/view/167

В статье обсуждается концепция корпоративной социальной ответственности в современной экономике. Инструменты реализации социальной ответственности компаний рассматриваются как формирующие их конкурентные преимущества. Определяются мотивы, побуждающие участников современных экономических отношений к социально ответственному поведению. Отмечается роль Глобального договора ООН как драйвера деятельности компаний в условиях современности. Характеризуется специфика инициатив в области корпоративной социальной ответственности в современной России. Раскрываются возможные перспективы развития данного аспекта экономической деятельности в современной России.

The article discusses the concept of corporate social иresponsibility in the modern economy. The tools for implementing the social responsibility of companies are considered as forming their competitive advantages. The motives that encourage participants of modern economic relations to socially responsible behavior are determined. The role of the UN Global Compact as a driver of companies' activities in modern times is noted. The specificity of initiatives in the field of corporate social responsibility in modern Russia is characterized. The possible prospects for the development of this aspect of economic activity in modern Russia are revealed.

корпоративная социальная ответственностьконкурентное преимуществоГлобальный договор ООНустойчивое развитиеэкономическая современностьcorporate social responsibilitycompetitive advantageThe UN Global Compactsustainable developmenteconomic modernityReferencesБаза данных участников Global Compact. URL: https://www.unglobalcompact.org/engage-locallyBaza dannyh uchastnikov Global Compact, available at: https://www.unglobalcompact.org/engage-locallyДемкина К. А. Корпоративная социальная ответственность, как фактор конкурентного преимущества компании // Бизнес-образование в экономике знаний. 2018. № 2 (10). URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/korporativnaya-sotsialnaya-otvetstvennost-kak-faktor-konkurentnogo-preimuschestva-kompanii (дата обращения: 14.04.2021).Demkina K. A. Korporativnaja social'naja otvetstvennost', kak faktor konkurentnogo preimushhestva kompanii, Biznes-obrazovanie v jekonomike znanij, 2018, № 2 (10), available at: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/korporativnaya-sotsialnaya-otvetstvennost-kak-faktor-konkurentnogo-preimuschestva-kompanii (accessed 14.04.2021).Нефинансовая отчетность в экономике: опыт XIX — начала XXI в. / М. Л. Пятов, Т. Н. Соловей, А. С. Сорокина, А. А. Гусниева // Вестн. С.-Петерб. ун-та. Экономика. 2018. № 34 (3). С. 465—492. URL: https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu05.2018.306Pjatov M. L., Solovej T. N., Sorokina A. S., Gusnieva A. A. Nefinansovaja otchetnost' v jekonomike: opyt XIX — nachala XXI v., Vestn. S.-Peterb. un-ta. Jekonomika, 2018, № 34 (3), pp. 465—492. available at: https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu05.2018.306Пятов М. Л., Соловей Т. Н. Практика распространения нефинансовых отчетов компаний как способ формирования их конкурентных преимуществ // Вестн. проф. бухгалтеров. 2017. № 3. C. 29—42.Pjatov M. L., Solovej T. N. Praktika rasprostranenija nefinansovyh otchetov kompanij kak sposob formirovanija ih konkurentnyh preimushhestv, Vestn. prof. buhgalterov, 2017, № 3, pp. 29—42.Российский бизнес и Цели устойчивого развития. Сборник корпоративных практик / Е. Н. Феоктистова, Г. А. Копылова, М. Н. Озерянская, М. В. Москвина, Н. И. Хофманн, Д. Р. Пуртова ; РСПП. М., 2018. 200 с.Feoktistova E. N., Kopylova G. A., Ozerjanskaja M. N., Moskvina M. V., Hofmann N. I., Purtova D. R. Rossijskij biznes i Celi ustojchivogo razvitija. Sbornik korporativnyh praktik, Moscow, 2018, 200 p.Устойчивое развитие. Роль России, Глобальный Договор ООН. Итоги опроса российских компаний о текущем уровне и перспективах их вовлеченности в реализацию целей устойчивого развития ООН. 2018. URL: http://www.globalcompact.ru/upload/iblock/376/Itogi-oprosa_broshyura.pdf (дата обращения: 14.04.2021).Ustojchivoe razvitie. Rol' Rossii, Global'nyj Dogovor OON. Itogi oprosa rossijskih kompanij o tekushhem urovne i perspektivah ih vovlechennosti v realizaciju celej ustojchivogo razvitija OON, 2018, available at: http://www.globalcompact.ru/upload/iblock/376/Itogi-oprosa_broshyura.pdf (accessed 14.04.2021).Шахназарян Б. А., Тельных В. С. Корпоративная социальная ответственность как фактор конкурентного преимущества предприятия // Тавр. науч. обозреватель. 2016. № 1—2 (6). URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/korporativnaya-sotsialnaya-otvetstvennost-kak-faktor-konkurentnogo-preimuschestva-predpriyatiya (дата обращения: 14.04.2021).Shahnazarjan B. A., Tel'nyh V. S. Korporativnaja social'naja otvetstvennost' kak faktor konkurentnogo preimushhestva predprijatija, Tavr. nauch. obozrevatel', 2016, № 1—2 (6), available at: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/korporativnaya-sotsialnaya-otvetstvennost-kak-faktor-konkurentnogo-preimuschestva-predpriyatiya (accessed 14.04.2021).Aqueveque C., Rodrigo P., Duran I. J. Be bad but (still) look good: Can controversial industries enhance corporate reputation through CSR initiatives? // Business Ethics: A European Review. 2018. Vol. 27(3). Р. 222—237.Aqueveque C., Rodrigo P., Duran I.J. Be bad but (still) look good: Can controversial industries enhance corporate reputation through CSR initia-tives?, Business Ethics: A European Review, 2018, vol. 27(3), pp. 222—237.Brennan N., Merkl-Davies D. Accounting narratives and impression management. The Routledge Companion to Communication in Accounting. London, Routledge, 2013. Р. 109—132.Brennan N., Merkl-Davies D. Accounting narratives and impression management. The Routledge Companion to Communication in Accounting. London, Routledge, 2013, pp. 109—132.Cegliński P., Wiśniewska A. CSR as a Source of Competitive Advantage: The Case Study of Polpharma Group // Journal of Corporate Responsibility and Leadership. 2017. Vol. 3. P. 57—70.Cegliński P., Wiśniewska A. CSR as a Source of Competitive Advantage: The Case Study of Polpharma Group, Journal of Corporate Responsibility and Leadership, 2017, vol. 3, pp. 57—70.Corporate Social Responsibility as a Tool for Gaining Competitive Advantage / Deborah B. Motilewa et al. // International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Review. 2015. 1 (1): 16—24.Motilewa Deborah B. et al. Corporate Social Responsibility as a Tool for Gaining Competitive Advantage, International Journal of Multidis-ciplinary Research and Review, 2015, 1 (1), pp. 16—24.Crisóstomo V. L., Freire F. de Souza, Vasconcellos F. C. Corporate social responsibility, firm value and financial performance in Brazil // Social Responsibility Journal. 2011. 7 (2). Р. 295—309.Crisóstomo V. L., Freire F. de Souza, Vasconcellos F. C. Corporate social responsibility, firm value and financial performance in Brazil, Social Responsibility Journal, 2011, 7 (2), pp. 295—309.Dierkes M., Lee P. E. Corporate social accounting reporting for the physical environment: A critical review and implementation proposal // Accounting, Organizations and Society. 1977. 2 (1). Р. 3—22.Dierkes M., Lee P. E. Corporate social accounting reporting for the physical environment: A critical review and implementation proposal, Accounting, Organizations and Society, 1977, 2 (1), pp. 3—22.Du Sh., Bhattacharya C. B., Sen S. Corporate Social Responsibility and Competitive Advantage: Overcoming the Trust Barrier // Management Science. 2010. 57. Р. 1528—1545.Du Sh., Bhattacharya C. B., Sen S. Corporate Social Responsibility and Competitive Advantage: Overcoming the Trust Barrier, Management Science, 2010, 57, pp. 1528—1545.Esrock S., Leichty G. Social responsibility and corporate web pages: self-presentation or agenda-setting? // Public Relations Review. 1998. Vol. 24. No. 3. Р. 305.Esrock S., Leichty G. Social responsibility and corporate web pages: self-presentation or agenda-setting?, Public Relations Review, 1998, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 305.Freedman M., Stagliano A. J. The market impact of social information: investigator reaction to public disclosure. Proceedings // AAA Mid Atlantic Regional Meeting. 1984.Freedman M., Stagliano A. J. The market impact of social information: investigator reaction to public disclosure. Proceedings, AAA Mid Atlantic Regional Meeting, 1984.Galbreath J. How does corporate social responsibility benefit firms? Evidence from Australia // European Business Review. 2010. Vol. 22. No. 4. Р. 411—431.Galbreath J. How does corporate social responsibility benefit firms? Evidence from Australia, European Business Review, 2010, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 411—431.Garriga E., Mele D. Corporate social responsibility theories: Mapping the territory // Journal of Business Ethics. 2004. 53. Р. 51—71.Garriga E., Mele D. Corporate social responsibility theories: Mapping the territory, Journal of Business Ethics, 2004, 53, pp. 51—71.Hahn R., lfs R. Legitimizing negative aspects in GRI-oriented sustainability reporting: a qualitative analysis of corporate disclosure strategies // J. Bus. Ethics. 2014. 123 (3). P. 401—420.Hahn R., Lülfs R. Legitimizing negative aspects in GRI-oriented sus-tainability reporting: a qualitative analysis of corporate disclosure strategies, J. Bus. Ethics, 2014, 123 (3), pp. 401—420.Heflin F., Wallace D. The BP Oil Spill: Shareholder Wealth Effects and Environmental Disclosures // Journal of Business Finance & Accounting. 2017. Vol. 44. Iss. 3, March/April. Р. 337—374.Heflin F., Wallace D. The BP Oil Spill: Shareholder Wealth Effects and Environmental Disclosures, Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 2017, vol. 44, iss. 3, March/April, pp. 337—374.How does corporate social responsibility contribute to firm financial performance? The mediating role of competitive advantage, reputation, and customer satisfaction / S. P. Saeidi et. al. // Journal of Business Research. 2015. Vol. 68. Iss. 2. Р. 341—350.Saeidi S. P. et. al. How does corporate social responsibility contribute to firm financial performance? The mediating role of competitive advantage, reputation, and customer satisfaction, Journal of Business Research, 2015, vol. 68, iss. 2, pp. 341—350.Husted B., Allen D. Corporate social responsibility in the multinational enterprise: strategic and institutional approaches // Journal of International Business Studies. 2006. Vol. 37. Р. 838—49.Husted B., Allen D. Corporate social responsibility in the multinational enterprise: strategic and institutional approaches, Journal of International Business Studies, 2006, vol. 37, pp. 838—49.Kareem M. Shabana, Ann K. Buchholtz, Archie B. Carroll. The Institutionalization of Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting // Business & Society. 2017. No. 56 (8). P. 1107—1135.Kareem M. Shabana, Ann K. Buchholtz, Archie B. Carroll. The Institutionalization of Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting, Business & Society, 2017, no. 56 (8), pp. 1107—1135.Kotler P., Lee N. Corporate Social Responsibility: Doing the Most Good for Your Company and Your Cause. John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken. NJ, 2005.Kotler P., Lee N. Corporate Social Responsibility: Doing the Most Good for Your Company and Your Cause. John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, New Jersey, 2005.Lin C. H., Yang H. L., Liou D. Y. The impact of corporate social responsibility on financial performance: Evidence from business in Taiwan // Technology in Society. 2009. 31 (1). 56—63.Lin C. H., Yang H. L., Liou D. Y. The impact of corporate social responsibility on financial performance: Evidence from business in Taiwan, Technology in Society, 2009, 31 (1), pp. 56—63.Lindblom C. K. The Implications of Organisational Legitimacy for Corporate Social Performance and Disclosure. Conference Paper, Critical Perspectives on Accounting Conference. NY, 1993.Lindblom C. K. The Implications of Organisational Legitimacy for Corporate Social Performance and Disclosure. Conference Paper, Critical Perspectives on Accounting Conference, New York, 1993.Mahapatra S. Investor reaction to a corporate social accounting // Journal of Business Finance and Accounting, 1984. 11 (1). Р. 29—40.Mahapatra S. Investor reaction to a corporate social accounting, Journal of Business Finance and Accounting, 1984, 11 (1), pp. 29—40.Malcolm S., Khadijah Y., Ahmad Marzuki A. Environmental disclosure and performance reporting in Malaysia // Asian Review of Accounting. 2007. 15(2). P. 185—199.Malcolm S., Khadijah Y., Ahmad Marzuki A. Environmental disclosure and performance reporting in Malaysia, Asian Review of Accounting, 2007, 15 (2), pp. 185—199.Margolis J. D., Walsh J. P. Misery loves companies: Rethinking social initiatives by business // Admin. Sci. Quart. 2003. 48 (2). P. 268—305.Margolis J. D., Walsh J. P. Misery loves companies: Rethinking social initiatives by business, Admin. Sci. Quart, 2003, 48 (2), pp. 268—305.Mathews M. R., Perera M. H. B. Accounting Theory & Development. Third ed. An International Thomson Publishing Company, Australia. 1996. 402 p.Mathews M. R., Perera M. H. B. Accounting Theory & Development. Third ed. An International Thomson Publishing Company, Australia, 1996, 402 p.Miska C., Szőcs I., Schiffinger M. Culture's effects on corporate sustainability practices: A multi‒domain and multi‒level view // Journal of World Business. 2018. Vol. 53 (2). P. 263—279.Miska C., Szőcs I., Schiffinger M. Culture's effects on corporate sus-tainability practices: A multi–domain and multilevel view, Journal of World Business, 2018, vol. 53 (2), pp. 263—279.Nader R. Corporate Disclosure: The Public Right to Know // Journal of Contemporary Business. 1978. Winter. P. 25—32.Nader R. Corporate Disclosure: The Public Right to Know, Journal of Contemporary Business, 1978, Winter, pp. 25—32.Opoku-Dakwa A., Chen C. C., Rupp D. E. CSR initiative characteristics and employee engagement: An impact-based perspective // Journal of Organizational Behavior. 2018. Vol. 39 (5). Р. 580—593.Opoku-Dakwa A., Chen C. C., Rupp D. E. CSR initiative characteristics and employee engagement: An impact-based perspective, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 2018, vol. 39 (5), pp. 580—593.Porter M. E., Kramer M. R. Strategy and society: The link between competitive advantage and corporate social responsibility // Harvard Bus. Rev. 2006. 84 (12). Р. 78—92.Porter M. E., Kramer M. R. Strategy and society: The link between competitive advantage and corporate social responsibility, Harvard Bus. Rev., 2006, 84 (12), pp. 78—92.Rettab B., Brik A., Mellahi K. A study of management perceptions of the impact of corporate social responsibility on organisational performance in emerging economies: The case of Dubai // Journal of Business Ethics. 2009. 89 (3). P. 371—390.Rettab B., Brik A., Mellahi K. A study of management perceptions of the impact of corporate social responsibility on organisational performance in emerging economies: The case of Dubai, Journal of Business Ethics, 2009, 89 (3), pp. 371—390.Samkin G., Schneider A. Accountability, narrative reporting and legitimation // Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 2010. Vol. 23. Iss. 2. P. 256—289.Samkin G., Schneider A. Accountability, narrative reporting and legitimation, Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 2010, vol. 23, iss. 2, pp. 256—289.Sen S., Bhattacharya C. B., Korschun D. The role of corporate social responsibility in strengthening multiple stakeholder relationships: A field experiment // J. Acad. Marketing Sci. 2006. No. 34 (2). P. 158—166.Sen S., Bhattacharya C. B., Korschun D. The role of corporate social responsibility in strengthening multiple stakeholder relationships: A field experiment, J. Acad. Marketing Sci., 2006, no. 34 (2), pp. 158—166.Simmons C. J., Becker-Olsen K. L. Achieving marketing objectives through social sponsorships // J. Marketing. 2006. 70 (4). Р. 154—169.Simmons C. J., Becker-Olsen K. L. Achieving marketing objectives through social sponsorships, J. Marketing, 2006, 70 (4), pp. 154—169.Solovey T. Corporate social responsibility and financial reporting. Separate pasts and common future in integrated reporting. Schmidpeter R., Capaldi N., Idowu S. O. & Stürenberg Herrera A. (ed.). Springer, (CSR, Sustainability, Ethics and Governance). 2019.Solovey T. Corporate social responsibility and financial reporting. Separate pasts and common future in integrated reporting. Schmidpeter R., Capaldi N., Idowu S. O. & Stürenberg Herrera A. (ed.). Springer, (CSR, Sustainability, Ethics and Governance), 2019.Solovey T., Kanugina N. Corporate social responsibility of small and medium enterprises in developed and emerging economies: cases of Germany and Russia. “New Challenges of Economic and Business Development—2018: Productivity and Economic Growth”: Riga, Latvia, May 10—12, 2018. Proceedings. Riga : University of Latvia, 2018. Р. 661—671.Solovey T., Kanugina N. Corporate social responsibility of small and medium enterprises in developed and emerging economies: cases of Germany and Russia. “New Challenges of Economic and Business Development—2018: Productivity and Economic Growth”, Riga, Latvia, May 10—12, 2018, Proceedings. Riga, University of Latvia Publ., 2018, 661—671 p.SOMO / EPSU (12/2012) Electricity companies less transparent than claimed — Multiple discrepancies found in sustainability reports. URL: http://www.epsu.org/a/91903SOMO / EPSU (12/2012) Electricity companies less transparent than claimed - Multiple discrepancies found in sustainability reports, available at: http://www.epsu.org/a/91903Spence M. Job Market Signaling // The Quarterly Journal of Economics. 1973. 87 (3). P. 355—374.Spence M. Job Market Signaling, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1973, 87 (3), pp. 355—374.Usage of public corporate communications of social responsibility in Brazil, Russia, India and China (BRIC) / L. Alon, C. Lattemann, M. Fetscherin, S. Li, A. Schneider // International Journal of Emerging Markets. 2010. Vol. 5. No. 1. P. 6—22. URL: https://proxy.library.spbu.ru:2060/10.1108/17468801011018248I. Alon, C. Lattemann, M. Fetscherin, S. Li, A. Schneider Usage of public corporate communications of social responsibility in Brazil, Russia, India and China (BRIC), International Journal of Emerging Markets, 2010, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 6—22, available at: https://proxy.library.spbu.ru:2060/10.1108/17468801011018248Uyar A., Karaman A. S., Kilic M. Is corporate social responsibility reporting a tool of signaling or greenwashing? Evidence from the worldwide logistics sector // Journal of Cleaner Production. 2020. No. 253.Uyar A., Karaman A. S., Kilic M. Is corporate social responsibility re-porting a tool of signaling or greenwashing? Evidence from the worldwide logistics sector, Journal of Cleaner Production, 2020, no. 253.Van Beurden P., Gössling T. The worth of values — A literature review on the relation between corporate social and financial performance // Journal of Business Ethics. 2008. 82 (2). P. 407—424.Van Beurden P., Gössling T. The worth of values — A literature re-view on the relation between corporate social and financial performance, Journal of Business Ethics, 2008, 82 (2), pp. 407—424.Vienna University Studie 12/2012, CSR-reporting.blogspot.nl. URL: http://csr-reporting.blogspot.de/2012/11/false-claims-insustainability-reports.htmlVienna University Studie 12/2012, CSR-reporting. blogspot.nl., available at: http://csr-reporting.blogspot.de/2012/11/false-claims-insustainability-reports.htmlVisser О., Kurakin A., Nikulin A. Corporate social responsibility, coexistence and contestation: large farms’ changing responsibilities vis-à-vis rural households in Russia, Canadian Journal of Development Studies // Revue canadienne d'études du développement. 2019. 40:4. P. 580—599.Visser O., Kurakin A., Nikulin A. Corporate social responsibility, coex-istence and contestation: large farms’ changing responsibilities vis-à-vis ru-ral households in Russia, Canadian Journal of Development Studies, Revue canadienne d'études du développement, 2019, no. 40:4, pp. 580—599.Walker K., Zhang Z., Ni N. The Mirror effect: Corporate social responsibility, corporate social irresponsibility and firm performance in coordinated market economies and Liberal market economies // British Journal of Management. 2019. 30 (1). Р. 151—168.Walker K., Zhang Z., Ni N. The Mirror effect: Corporate social responsibility, corporate social irresponsibility and firm performance in coor-dinated market economies and Liberal market economies, British Journal of Management, 2019, no. 30 (1), pp. 151—168.Why, when, and how should the effect of marketing be measured? A stakeholder perspective for corporate social responsibility metrics / P. Raghubir, J. Roberts, K. N. Lemon, R. S. Winer // J. Public Policy Marketing. 2010. 29 (1). 66—77.Raghubir P., Roberts J., Lemon K. N., Winer R. S. Why, when, and how should the effect of marketing be measured? A stakeholder perspective for corporate social responsibility metrics, J. Public Policy Marketing, 2010, 29 (1), pp. 66—77.Yu H.-C., Kuo L., Kao M.-F. The relationship between CSR disclosure and competitive advantage // Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal. 2017. Vol. 8 No. 5. Р. 547—570. URL: https://proxy.library.spbu.ru:2060/10.1108/SAMPJ-11-2016-0086Yu H.-C., Kuo L., Kao M.-F. The relationship between CSR disclosure and competitive advantage, Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 2017, vol. 8, no. 5, pp. 547—570, available at: https://proxy.library.spbu.ru:2060/10.1108/SAMPJ-11-2016-0086Zabneva E., Kuznetsova Yu. The quality of corporate social responsibility of large coal mining companies in Russia. E3S Web Conf. 20807010 (2020).Zabneva E., Kuznetsova Yu. The quality of corporate social responsibility of large coal mining companies in Russia. E3S Web Conf. 20807010 (2020).

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.