Attractiveness of the development of high-tech industries in the USA: urboterritorial
https://doi.org/10.32324/2412-8945-2022-2-59-68
Abstract
The subject of the study is the attractiveness of the development of high-tech industries in the United States in the space of urban areas that economically and statistically correspond to the mega-regions of the country. Modeling the relationship between the field of settlement / field of economic activity and the attractiveness of industry within the framework of the Industry 4.0 concept implemented in the United States in the 2010s allows us to obtain combined empirical results calculated on average over two ten-year periods of time of the current century. The latter fully or partially confirm the urban-oriented nature of the interdependence of innovative/knowledge-intensive areas of production and the urbanized settlement system, which changes under the influence of system-cyclic factors, both in time and in space.
About the Author
V. N. Minat
Ryazan State Agrotechnological University named after P. A. Kostychev
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Valery N. Minat — Candidate of Geographical Sciences, Associate Professor, Associate Professor of the Department of Economics and Management
Ryazan
References
1. Glaz'ev S.Ju. Mirohozjajstvennye uklady v global'nom jekonomicheskom razvitii [World Economic Patterns in Global Economic Development], Jekonomika i matematicheskie metody [Economics and Mathematical Methods], 2016, vol. 52, no. 2, pp. 3—29.
2. Tolkachev S.A., Tepljakov A.Ju. Koncepcija ciklicheskoj posledovatel'nosti rasprostranenija ba-zisnyh tehnologij v jekonomike i ontologicheskaja obuslovlennost' teorij industrial'nogo obshhestva [The concept of cyclical sequence of distribution of basic technologies in the economy and ontological conditionality of theories of industrial society], Jekonomicheskoe vozrozhdenie Rossii [Economic revival of Russia], 2019, no. 4 (62), pp. 19—36.
3. Piketti T. Kapital v XXI veke [Capital in the 21st Century]. Moscow: Ad Marginem Press, 2015, 592 p. (in Russ.)
4. Harvey D. Spaces of global capitalism: Towards a theory of uneven geographical development. L., N.Y.: Verso, 2006. 156 p.
5. Glaz'ev S.Ju. O glubinnyh prichinah narastajushhego haosa i merah po preodoleniju jekonomiche-skogo krizisa [On the root causes of the growing chaos and measures to overcome the economic crisis], Evrazijskaja integracija: jekonomika, pravo, politika [Eurasian Integration: Economics, Law, Politics], 2020, no. 2 (32), pp. 11—22. DOI: 10.22394/2073-2929-2020-2-11-22
6. Arrigi Dzh. Dolgij dvadcatyj vek. Den'gi, vlast' i istoki nashego vremeni [The Long Twentieth Century. Money, Power and the Origins of Our Time]. Moscow: Territorija budushhego, 2006, 470 p. (in Russ.)
7. Komolov O.O. Krizis globalizacii kak otrazhenie predelov kapitalisticheskogo razvitija [The Crisis of Globalization as a Reflection of the Limits of Capitalist Development], Vopr. politicheskoj jekonomii [Issues of Political Economy], 2018, no 3, pp. 42—57.
8. Brenner R. Jekonomika global'noj turbulentnosti. Razvitye kapitalisticheskie jekonomiki v peri-od ot dolgogo buma do dolgogo spada, 1945—2005 [The Economics of Global Turbulence. Developed Capitalist Economies from the Long Boom to the Long Recession, 1945—2005]. Moscow: ID VShJe, 2014, 552 p. (in Russ.)
9. Komolov O.O. Norma pribyli v kontekste nestabil'nosti mirovoj jekonomiki [Profit rate in the context of global economic instability], Vestn. In-ta jekonomiki RAN [Vestnik of the Institute of Economics of the Russian Academy of Sciences], 2017, no. 3, pp. 35—52.
10. Varnavskij V.G. Transformacija mirovogo geojekonomicheskogo prostranstva v uslovijah reindustrializacii [Transformation of the global geo-economic space in the conditions of reindustrialization], Vestn. In-ta jekonomiki RAN [Vestnik of the Institute of Economics of the Russian Academy of Sciences], 2019, no. 2, pp. 119—133. DOI: 10.24411/2073-6487-2019-10022.
11. Kalashnikov D.B. Rol' TNK Kitaja v reshenii zadach modernizacii nacional'noj jekonomiki [The role of Chinese MNCs in solving the problems of modernization of the national economy]: cand. jekon. sci. diss. Moscow: MGIMOUniversitet, 2019, 264 p.
12. Minat V.N. Modelirovanie razvitija vysokotehnologichnyh otraslej jekonomiki SShA v uslovijah reindustrializacii [Modeling the development of high-tech industries in the U. S. economy under conditions of reindustrialization], Jekonomika vysokotehnologichnyh proizvodstv [Economics of high-tech industries], 2021, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 333—358. DOI: 10.18334/evp.2.4.113823.
13. Koval'chuk Ju.A., Ishhenko M.M. Vysokotehnologichnoe proizvodstvo kak «novoe okno vozmozhno-stej» v postkrizisnoj jekonomike [High-tech production as a «new window of opportunity» in the post-crisis economy], Vestn. Syktyvkarskogo gos. un-ta [Vestnik Syktyvkar State University], 2016, no. 3, pp. 25—33.
14. Varnavskij V. Globalizacija i strukturnye sdvigi v mirovom proizvodstve [Globalization and Structural Shifts in World Production], MJeMO [MEMO], 2019, vol. 63, no. 1, pp. 25—33. DOI: 10.20542/0131-2227-2019-63-1-25-33.
15. Polan'i-Levitt K. Razvitie i regionalizm: idei Karla Polan'i i sovremennaja mirosistema [Development and Regionalism: Carl Polanyi's Ideas and the Modern World System], Prognozis [Forecast], 2005, no. 2 (3), pp. 108—118.
16. Florida R. Who’s your city: How the creative economy is making where to live the most important decision of your life. N. Y.: Basic Books, 2008, 488 p.
17. Florida R., Gulden T., Mellander Ch. The Rise of the Mega Region. Toronto. The Martin Prosperity In-stitute, 2007, 564 p.
18. Peirce N., Johnson C., Hall J. Citistates: How urban America can prosper in a competitive world. Denver: Seven Locks Press, 1993, 430 p.
19. Novosel'ceva A.S. Kljuchevye funkcii megapolisov v global'noj jekonomike: sistemnost' issledovanija [Key Functions of Megacities in the Global Economy: Systematic Research], Vestn. Volgogradskogo gos. un-ta, Ser. 9, Jekonom. nauki [Vestnik Volgograd State University. Ser. 9. Economic sciences], 2011, Iss. 9, pp. 71—77.
20. Sluka N.A. Jevoljucija koncepcii «mirovyh gorodov» [Evolution of the concept of «world cities»], Regional'nye issledovanija [Regional Studies], 2005, no. 3, pp. 37—49.
21. Smirnjagin L.V. Megaregiony kak novaja forma territorial'noj organizacii obshhestva [Mega-regions as a new form of territorial organization of society], Vestn. Mosk. Un-ta. Ser. 5. Geografija [Vestnik of Moscow State University. Ser. 5. Geography], 2011, no. 1, pp. 9—15.
22. Minat V.N. Tipy territorial'nyh form nacional'noj innovacionnoj sistemy SShA i ih koncentracija v gorodskih aglomeracijah [Types of territorial forms of national innovation system of the USA and their concentration in urban agglomerations], Innovacii [Innovations], 2020, no. 5 (259), pp. 68—80. DOI: 10.26310/2071-3010.2020.259.5.010.
23. Minat V.N. Urboorientirovannoe innovacionnoe razvitie territorij SShA [Urban Innovative Development of U. S. Territories], Razvitie territorij [Territory Development], 2021, no. 3 (25), pp. 60—72. DOI: 10.32324/2412-8945-2021-3-60-72.
24. Minat V.N. Urboorientirovannoe razvitie nacional'noj innovacionnoj sistemy v prostranstve metropolitenskih arealov SShA [Urban-oriented development of the national innovation system in the space of metropolitan areas of the USA], Federalizm [Federalism], 2021, vol. 26, no. 1 (101), pp. 187—206. DOI: 10.21686/2073-1051-2021-1-187-206.
25. Baburin V.L. Vzaimosvjaz' rasselenija i razmeshhenija proizvodstva [Interrelation of Settlement and Production Placement], Regional'nye issledovanija [Regional Studies], 2014, no. 4 (46), pp. 5—16.
26. Minat V.N. Innovacionnaja dejatel'nost' i prostranstvennaja struktura obrabatyvajushhej promyshlennosti SShA [Innovation Activity and the Spatial Structure of the Manufacturing Industry in the USA], Innovacii [Innovations], 2020, no. 10 (264), pp. 82—94. DOI: 10.26310/2071-3010.2020.264.10.010.
27. Minat V.N. Innovacionnoe razvitie obrabatyvajushhej promyshlennosti SShA: regional'nyj aspekt [Innovative Development of the Manufacturing Industry in the USA: Regional Aspect], Nauka o cheloveke: gumanitarnye issledovanija [Science of Man: Humanitarian Studies], 2021, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 209—216. DOI: 10.17238/issn1998-5320.2021.15.1.23.
28. Minat V.N. Innovacionnoe razvitie promyshlennosti SShA: prostranstvennyj podhod [Innovative Industrial Development of the USA: Spatial Approach], Razvitie territorij [Territory Developmen], 2021, no. 2 (24), pp. 26—35. DOI: 10.32324/2412-8945-2021-2-26-35.
29. Gorodeckaja A.S. Osobennosti transformacii monoprofil'nyh promyshlennyh centrov SShA (na primere Pittsburga) [Peculiarities of the transformation of single-industry centers in the United States (the example of Pittsburgh)], Regional'nye issledovanija [Regional Studies], 2012, no. 4, pp. 120—126.
30. Zhuk N.P. Vzaimodejstvie kak faktor innovacionnogo razvitija: aglomeracionnye jeffekty [Interaction as a factor of innovation development: agglomeration effects], Innovacii [Innovations], 2014, no. 1, pp. 32—36.
31. Laiken G., Devaney O. Development of the economy in the territories and urbanization in the USA. How innovation spreads. Erban. University of Illinois, 2009. 440 p.
32. Baburin V.L., Zemcov S.P. Innovacionnyj potencial regionov Rossii: monografija [Innovation Potential of Russian Regions: Monograph]. Moscow: Univ. kn., 2017, 358 p.
33. Achkasova T.A. Geografizacija stadij innovacionnogo processa (na primere sovremennoj obraba-tyvajushhej promyshlennosti) [Geographicalization of the stages of the innovation process (on the example of modern manufacturing industry)], Regional'nye issledovanija [Regional Studies], 2010, no. 2 (28), pp. 23—31.
34. Auzan A.A. “Jeffekt kolei”. Problemy zavisimosti ot traektorii predshestvujushhego razvitija — jevoljucionnaja gipoteza [The “rut effect”. Problems of Dependence on the Trajectory of Previous Development — Evolutionary Hypothesis], Vestn. Mosk. un-ta. Ser. 6. Jekonomika [Vestnik of Moscow State University. Ser. 6. Economics], 2015, no. 1, pp. 3—17.
35. Baburin V.L. Vlijanie jeffekta kolei na jevoljuciju promyshlennyh arealov Rossii [The influence of the gauge effect on the evolution of industrial areas of Russia], Regional'nye issledovanija [Regional Studies], 2020, no. 3 (69), pp. 26—39. DOI: 10.5922/1994-5280-2020-3-3.
36. Minat V.N. Megaregional'noe innovacionnoe razvitie SShA: prostranstvenno-vremennoj analiz [Mega-regional innovation development of the USA: spatial and temporal analysis], Vestn. NGUJeU [Vestnik NSUEM], 2022, no. 1, pp. 190—210.
37. Aprobacija metodiki opredelenija bazovyh, vedushhih i progressivnyh sektorov promyshlennogo proizvodstva regiona na primere Nizhegorodskoj oblasti [Approbation of the methodology for determining the basic, leading and progressive sectors of industrial production in the region on the example of the Nizhny Novgorod region], D.Ju. Kovylkin, O.V. Trofimov, V.G. Frolov, L.V. Strelkova, Ju.A. Makusheva, Jekonomicheskie otnoshenija [Economic relations], 2019, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 3045—3059. DOI: 10.18334/eo.9.4.41284.
38. Razrabotka metodiki opredelenija bazovyh, vedushhih i progressivnyh sektorov promyshlennogo proizvodstva regiona [Development of methods for determining the basic, leading and progressive sectors of industrial production in the region], D.Ju. Kovylkin, O.V. Trofimov, V.G. Frolov, L.V. Strelkova, Ju.A. Makusheva, Kreativnaja jekonomika [Creative Economy], 2019, vol. 13, no. 11, nojabr', pp. 2179—2194. DOI: 10.18334/se.13.11.41277.
39. Minat V.N. Mezojekonomicheskoe modelirovanie strukturnyh sdvigov promyshlennosti SShA: otraslevaja i prostranstvennaja sostavljajushhie [Mesoeconomic Modeling of Structural Shifts in U. S. Industry: Sectoral and Spatial Components], Jekonomicheskaja nauka sovremennoj Rossii [Economic Science of Modern Russia], 2022, no. 1 (96), pp. 94—109. DOI: 10.33293/1609-1442-2022-1(96)–94-109.
40. Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA). Industry Data. Available at: https://apps.bea.gov/iTable/iTable.cfm?ReqID=51&step=1 (accessed: 10.03.2022).
41. Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA). International Trade in Goods and Services. Available at: https://www.bea.gov/data/intl-trade-investment/international-trade-goods-and-services (accessed: 10.03.2022).
42. Manufacturing Annual Report. United States Department of Commerce. Available at: https://www.pwc.co.uk/industries/manufacturing/insights/annual-manufacturing-report.html (accessed: 10.03.2022).
43. State of North American Manufacturing. Annual Report. Available at: https://business.thomasnet.com/state-of-northamerican-manufacturing-ualp (accessed: 10.03.2022).
44. The State of U. S. Science and Engineering indicators. Available at: https://ncses.nsf.gov/indicators (accessed: 10.03.2022).
Review
For citations:
Minat V.N. Attractiveness of the development of high-tech industries in the USA: urboterritorial. Territory Development. 2022;(2 (28)):59-68. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.32324/2412-8945-2022-2-59-68
Views:
328
Email this article 