Modeling of socio-demographic development in the settlement system of cross-border regions of the U.S.A.

The prediction of socio-demographic development of American transboundary regions as complex open mesoterritorial systems, historically and functionally based on the strengthening of diverse interaction between the United States and neighboring countries (Mexico and Canada), is relevant and practically significant in the design of changes in the settlement system of these territories. On the basis of unified system and meso-economic spatio-temporal modeling used in the present work, the author combined methods of multivariate analysis, linear programming, correlation calculations and others, adequate to the methodology and technique of socio-demographic forecasting. According to the results of an empirical study, hypotheses were confirmed about the possibility of a gradual escalation in the next decade of demographic and ethno-cultural turbulence in the settlement system of the trans-border territories of the southwestern United States bordering Mexico into the initial stage of regionalization caused by the projected increase in migration from Latin American countries; about an increase in imbalance and spatial inequality, reducing optimization in the ratio of the able-bodied population; in the conditions of a new technological order; on the increasing role of mutual influence of settlements of trans-regional regions of the USA, which form the material and territorial basis of the settlement system. The results of regression modeling of prospective changes in quantitative indicators of natural and mechanical population growth of a particular locality that has its rank in the settlement system of a cross-border region of the USA have shown that the qualitative nature and direction of dynamics of elements (objects, processes, environment, projects) of socio-demographic development depend on the size of the city center, neighboring settlements and suburbanized zones and the interactions between them.

1. Rutkauskas A.-V.M. Sistema prognozirovaniya regional'nogo vosproizvodstva [Regional reproduction forecasting system]. Moscow, Nauka, 1977, 85 p.

2. Timchuka N.F. (ed.) Modelirovanie territorial'nykh sistem (prognozirovanie i optimizatsiya proektnykh reshenii) [Modeling of territorial systems (forecasting and optimization of design solutions)]. Kiev, Budivel'nik, 1992, 144 p.

3. Kleinera G.B. (ed.) Mezoekonomika razvitiya [The mesoeconomics of development]. Moscow, Nauka, 2010, 944 p.

4. Chereshneva V.A., Tatarkina A.I., Glaz'eva S.Yu. (eds.) Prognozirovanie sotsial'no-ekonomicheskogo razvitiya regiona [The forecasting of socio-economic development of the region]. Ekaterinburg, Institut ekonomiki UrO RAN, 2011, 1104 p.

5. Naumov S.V., Ermolenko A.A. Kategoriya mesta v so-vremennoi teorii ekonomicheskogo prostranstva [The category of place in modern theory of economic space], Prostranstvennaya ekonomika [The Spatial Economy], 2020, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 101—123. DOI: 10.14530/se.2020.2.101-123.

6. Baklanova P.Ya., Shinkovskogo M.Yu. (eds.) Transgranichnyi region. Ponyatie, sushchnost', forma [The transboundary region. Concept, essence, form]. Vladivostok, Dal'nauka, 2010, 276 p.

7. Minat V.N. Modelirovanie prostranstvennogo raz-vitiya transgranichnykh regionov SShA kak sotsial'no-ekonomicheskikh sistem mezourovnya [Modeling the spatial development of transboundary regions of the United States as socio-economic systems at the mesolevel], Ekonomicheskaya nauka sovremennoi Rossii [Economic science of modern Russia], 2022, no. 3 (98), pp. 83—96. DOI: 10.33293/1609-1442-2022-3(98)-83-96.

8. Revised Delineations. Revised Delineations of Metropoli-tan Statistical Areas, Micropolitan Statistical Areas, and Combined Statistical Areas, and Guidance on Uses of the De-lineations of These Areas, Office of Management and Budget bulletin, 2013, no. 13—01, 454 p.

9. Becker G.S. A Treatise on the Family. Enlarged edition. Cambrridge, Massachusetts, Harvard, University Press, 1993, 440 p.

10. Asemoglu D. Vvedenie v teoriyu sovremennogo ekonomicheskogo rosta [Introduction to the theory of modern economic growth], in 2 b. Book 2. Moscow, Delo, RANKhiGS, 2018, 736 p. (in Russ)

11. Becker G.S., Murphy K.M., Tamura R. Human Capital, Fertility and Economic Growth, Journal of Political Economy, 1990, vol. 98 (part 2), no. 5, pp. S12—S37. DOI: 0022-3808'90/9803-0012$01 50.

12. Florida R. Who’s your city: How the creative economy is making where to live the most important decision of your life. New York, Basic Books, 2008, 488 p.

13. Wacquant L. Urban Marginality in the Coming Millenni-um, Urban Studies, 1999, vol. 36, no. 10, pp. 1639—1647. DOI: 10.1080/0042098992746.

14. Banerjee A.V., Newman A. Information, the Dual Econ-omy and Development, Review of Economic Studies, 1998, vol. 65, no. 4, pp. 631—653. DOI: 0034-6527/98/00290631S02.00.

15. Acemoglu D., Zilibotti F. Information Accumulation in Development, Journal of Economic Growth, 1999, vol. 4, issue 1, pp. 5—38.

16. Peirce N., Johnson C., Hall J. Citistates: How urban America can prosper in a competitive world. Denver, Seven Locks Press, 1993, 430 p.

17. Buckley F.H. American Secession: The Looming Threat of a National Breakup. New York, London, Encounter books, 2020, 184 p.

18. Shtoyunda E.M. Federalizm epokhi global'noi turbulentnosti [Federalism in an age of global turbulence], SShA & Kanada: ekonomika, politika, kul'tura [USA and Canada: economics, politics, culture], 2021, vol. 51, no. 4, pp. 54—72. DOI: 10.31857/S268667300014339-2.

19. Minat V.N. Otsenka differentsiatsii etnodemograficheskogo faktora kul'turnoi evolyutsii v SShA: regional'noe issledovanie [An Evaluation of the differentiation of ethnodemographic factors in cultural evolution in the United States: A Regional Study], Regionalistika [Regionalistics], 2022, vol. 9, no. 5, pp. 64—87. DOI: 10.14530/reg.2022.5.64.

20. Minat V.N. Etnodemograficheskaya neodnorodnost' i sotsial'no-ekonomicheskoe razvitie yugo-zapadnykh shtatov SShA [Ethno-demographic heterogeneity and socio-economic development in the southwestern United States], Obshchestvennye nauki i sovremennost' [Economic science of modern Russia], 2022, no. 5, pp. 128—143. DOI: 10.31857/S0869049922050069.

21. Piorunskii I.D., Sumberg G.I., Mukhametzyanov I.Z. Prognoz klyuchevykh pokazatelei slozhnoorganizovannoi ekonomicheskoi sistemy [Forecast of key indicators of a complex economic system], Ekonomicheskaya nauka sovremennoi Rossii [Economic science of modern Russia], 2022, no. 4 (99), pp. 49—62. DOI: 10.33293/1609-1442-2022-4(99)-49-62.

22. Tkachenko A.A. Ekonomika narodonaseleniya versus ekonomicheskaya demografiya [Population economics versus economic demography], Statistika i ekonomika [Statistics and economics], 2017, vol. 14, no. 5, pp. 94—104. DOI: 10.21686/2500-3925-2017-5-94-104.

23. Petrovskaya N.E. Molodezhnyi rynok truda v SShA [Youth Labor Market in the United States], Obshchestvennye nauki i sovremennost' [Social sciences and modernity], 2021, no. 2, pp. 66—78. DOI: 10.31857/S086904990014322-6.

24. Marusenko M.A., Marusenko N.M. Perepisi naseleniya v SShA i etnorasovyi vopros [The U.S. Census and the Ethnoracial Question], SShA & Kanada: ekonomika, politika, kul'tura [USA and Canada: economics, politics, culture], 2019, vol. 49, no. 6, pp. 5—21. DOI: 10.31857/S032120680005176-7.

25. Minat V.N. Vliyanie etnokul'turnogo raznoobraziya na ekonomicheskii rost i prostranstvennoe razvitie transgranichnykh territorii SShA [The Impact of ethno-cultural diversity on economic growth and spatial development in cross-border areas of the United States], Vestnik Chelyabinskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta [Vestnik (Herald) of Chelyabinsk State University], 2022, no. 12 (470), Ekonomicheskie nauki [Economic sciences], issue. 79, pp. 55—67. DOI: 10.47475/1994-2796-2022-11207.

26. Spreg Sh. Zamedlenie rosta proizvoditel'nosti truda v SShA: analiz na urovne ekonomiki i otraslei [The slowdown in U.S. productivity growth: an economic and sectoral analysis], Ekonomist [The Economist], 2021, no. 5, pp. 13—53.