URBAN-ORIENTED INNOVATIVE DEVELOPMENT OF THE UNITED STATES TERRITORIES
https://doi.org/10.32324/2412-8945-2021-3-60-72
Abstract
The spatial nature of innovation activity in the modern USA is determined by the urban orientation of the territorial forms of this activity and depends on the complex impact of both regional factors and effects arising in transregional systems, which are defined by the author as innovative systems of agglomerations in United States and are the central object of this study. Comprehensive comparative analysis of territorial differences in terms of indicators and integrated index of regional development of the United States innovation systems and innovation systems of agglomerations within the country’s metropolitan statistical areas in 2001—2020 revealed the spatial heterogeneity of centre-peripheral innovation. The impact of the factors that caused the innovative development of the territories of the United States, based on the universal influence of three effects of urban-oriented placement of elements and processes of innovation activity, the most important of which are, respectively, innovative companies and the associated flow of knowledge and technologies, is empirically confirmed.
About the Author
V. N. Minat
Ryazan State Agrotechnological University Named after P. A. Kostychev
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Valery N. Minat, Candidate of Geographical Sciences, Associate Professor, Associate Professor at the Department of Economics and Management
Ryazan
References
1. Akopjan A. R. Rol' innovacionnyh klasterov v razvitii nacional'noj jekonomiki SShA, Vestn. Un-ta, 2016, № 6, pp. 162—165.
2. Baburin V. L., Zemcov S. P. Innovacionnyj potencial regionov Rossii, monogr, Moscow, Univ. kn., 2017, 358 p.
3. Bell D. Grjadushhee postindustrial'noe obshhestvo, Moscow, Academia, 2004, 944 p. (in Russ.)
4. Brenner R. Jekonomika global'noj turbulentnosti. Razvitye kapitalisticheskie jekonomiki v period ot dolgogo buma do dolgogo spada, 1945—2005, Moscow, ID VShJe, 2014, 552 p. (in Russ.)
5. Glaz'ev S. Ju. Teorija dolgosrochnogo tehniko-jekonomicheskogo razvitija, Moscow, VlaDar, 1993, 310 p.
6. Gorodeckaja A. S. Osobennosti transformacii monoprofil'nyh promyshlennyh centrov SShA (na primere Pittsburga), Region. Issled, 201, № 4, pp. 120—126.
7. Zhuk N. P. Vzaimodejstvie kak faktor innovacionnogo razvitija: aglomeracionnye jeffekty, Innovacii, 2014, № 1, pp. 32—36.
8. Kolomak E. A. Gorodskaja sistema sovremennoj Rossii, Novosibirsk, IJeOPP SO RAN Publ., 2018, 144 p.
9. Kuznecov D. V. Sovremennye osobennosti metropolitenizacii v SShA, Cand. geogr. sci. diss. Abstr., Saint-Petersburg, 2010, 16 p.
10. Minat V. N. Gosudarstvennaja informacionnaja politika i dinamika federal'nogo finansirovanija rasprostranenija rezul'tatov nauchnyh issledovanij i razrabotok SShA, Izv. Saratov. un-ta. Novaja serija: Jekonomika. Upravlenie. Pravo, 2021, vol. 21, iss. 1, pp. 38—47.
11. Minat V. N. Gosudarstvennaja regional'naja politika i razvitie regional'nyh innovacionnyh sistem v SShA, Federalizm, 2020, vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 173—188.
12. Minat V. N. Innovacionnoe razvitie promyshlennosti SShA: prostranstvennyj podhod, Razvitie territorij, 2021, no. 2 (24), pp. 26—35.
13. Minat V.N. Mezhdunarodnoe sotrudnichestvo shtatov i rajonov SShA v innovacionnoj dejatel'nosti, Vestn. NGUJeU, 2021, no. 1, pp. 221—234.
14. Minat V. N. Osobennosti funkcionirovanija regional'nyh innovacionnyh sistem v shtatah Severa SShA, Vestn. NGUJeU, 2020, no. 3, pp. 198—213.
15. Minat V. N. Tipy territorial'nyh form nacional'noj innovacionnoj sistemy SShA i ih koncentracija v gorodskih aglomeracijah, Innovacii, 2020, no. 5 (259), pp. 68—80.
16. Minat V. N. Urboorientirovannoe razvitie nacional'noj innovacionnoj sistemy v prostranstve metropolitenskih arealov SShA, Federalizm, 2021, vol. 26, no. 1 (101), pp. 187—206.
17. Minat V. N. Jevoljucija finansirovanija promyshlennyh NIOKR v SShA: dinamicheskie i strukturnye osobennosti, Vestn. Volgograd. gos. un-ta. Jekonomika, 2021, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 177—189.
18. Minat V. N., Chepik A. G. Vneshnetorgovye otnoshenija i innovacionnaja dejatel'nost' SShA, Mezhdunar. torgovlja i torgovaja politika, 2020, vol. 6, no. 2 (22), pp. 5—21.
19. Minat V. N., Chepik A. G. Sovremennye osobennosti raspredele-nija, ispol'zovanija i razmeshhenija nauchnogo personala v SShA, Vestn. NGUJeU, 2020, no. 2, pp. 198—212.
20. Petrovskij A. B., Pronichkin S. V., Sternin M. Ju., Shepelev G. I. Nacional'naja innovacionnaja sistema SShA: harakteristiki, oso-bennosti, puti razvitija, Nauch. vedomosti. Ser.: Jekonomika. Informa-tika, 2018, no. 2, vol. 45, pp. 343—352.
21. Porter M. Mezhdunarodnaja konkurencija, Moscow, Mezhdunarodnye otnoshenija Publ., 1993, 895 p. (in Russ.)
22. Savel'eva I. P., Kilina I. P. Prostranstvennye aspekty funkcionirovanija regional'nyh innovacionnyh system, Innovacii i investicii, 2019, no. 7, pp. 11—17.
23. Smirnjagin L. V. Megaregiony kak novaja forma territorial'noj organizacii obshhestva, Vestn. Moskov. un-ta. Ser. 5. Geografija, 2011, no. 1, pp. 9—15.
24. Harchenko E. V., Gejderih P. V. Cikly i jetapy social'no-jekonomicheskogo razvitija obshhestva v kontekste processov sozidatel'nogo razrushenija, Izv. Jugo-Zapad. gos. un-ta. Ser.: Jekonomika. Sociologija. Menedzhment, 2018, vol. 8, no. 2 (27), pp. 17—30.
25. Best Practices Manual. ERC. NSF, available at: https://erc-assoc.org/sites/default/files/ERC%20Best%20Practices%20Manual.pdf (accessed 28.04.2021).
26. Drucker P. The discipline of innovation, Harvard business review, 1998, no. 76 (6), pp. 149—157.
27. Florida R., Gulden T., Mellander Ch. The Rise of the Mega Region, Toronto, The Martin Prosperity Institute, 2007, 564 p.
28. Harkness P. The metropolitan era, Governing, 2008, June 30.
29. Innovation in American Regions, available at: https://www.statsamerica.org/innovation/ (accessed 02.05.2021).
30. Knapp W., Schmitt P. Restructuring Competitive Metropolitan Regions in North-west Europe: On Territory and Governance, Europ. J. Spatial Development, 2003, no. 6, available at: http://www.nordregio.se/Global/EJSD/Refereed%20articles/refereed (accessed 30.04.2021).
31. National Science Foundation. National Science Board. Science and Engineering Indictors, 2020, available at: https://ncses.nsf.gov/pubs/nsb20201 (accessed 24.04.2021).
32. Peirce N., Johnson C., Hall J. Citistates: How urban America can prosper in a competitive world. Denver: Seven Locks Press, 1993, 452 p.
33. Revised Delineations of Metropolitan Statistical Areas, Micropolitan Statistical Areas, and Combined Statistical Areas, and Guidance on Uses of the Delineations of These Areas, Offi ce of Management and Budget bulletin, 2013 February 28, no. 13—01.
34. Schumpeter J. Business Cycles: A Theoretical, Historical, and Statistical Analysis of the Capitalist Process (2vol), New York, McGraw-Hill, 1939, 438 p.
35. The 2020—2021 Long-Term Budget Outlook. Congress of the United States. Congressional Budget Office. available at: URL: https://www.whitehouse.gov (accessed 22.04.2021).
36. Von Proff S., Dettmann A. Inventor collaboration over distance: a comparison of academic and corporate patents, Scientometrics, 2013, no. 94 (3), pp. 1217—1238.
Review
For citations:
Minat V.N. URBAN-ORIENTED INNOVATIVE DEVELOPMENT OF THE UNITED STATES TERRITORIES. Territory Development. 2021;(3 (25)):60-72. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.32324/2412-8945-2021-3-60-72
Views:
1078
Email this article 