Preview

Territory Development

Advanced search

INNOVATIVE DEVELOPMENT OF THE USA INDUSTRY: A SPATIAL APPROACH

https://doi.org/10.32324/2412-8945-2021-2-26-35

Abstract

The subject of the study is the spatial innovative development of American industry. The nature and degree of spatial localization, concentration and correlation dependence of the USA manufacturing industries (as the most innovation intensive) on the implementation of relevant R&D is subject to study. The purpose of this study is to identify trends in the spatial innovation development of modern industry in the United States. We used such methods as abstract-logical, statistical economic (correlation analysis, localization indices), the techniques of which worked on the application of the typological approach. The results of the correlation analysis allow us to conclude that there is a significant (close to functional) direct relationship between the volume of innovative products and R&D expenditures — both in the whole country and in the leading states. The calculation of localization indices and the graphical interpretation of the results obtained made it possible to assess the dependence of the industry specialization of the USA states on the spatial features of the innovative development of industrial production, expressed in various territorial combinations — innovative types of development of national industry. Spatial innovative development of industrial production at the regional level clearly demonstrates a two-level “center-peripheral” trend, expressed in the identified typological combinations. The spatial development of American industry, aimed at increasing the efficiency of production of primarily innovative products, has developed in close interaction (mutual influence and mutual penetration) with the institutions of the national innovation system of the United States, which has been expressed in spatial localization, high concentration and in specific forms and types of territorial combinations of elements of both systems. At the same time, the spatial aspect of this mutual combination and interaction, which is of a traditional “center-peripheral” nature, is reflected in a clear trend of extreme polarization both at the state level and in more extensive spaces — within the regions and districts (groups of states) of the country. This necessitates a qualitatively higher level of interaction between the United States and other countries in the global system of innovation and economic development in order to build global production chains.

About the Author

V. N. Minat
Ryazan State Agrotechnological University named after P. A. Kostychev
Russian Federation

Valery N. MINAT — Candidate of Geographical Sciences, Associate Professor, Associate Professor



References

1. Baev L.A., Nikitin A.I. Territorial'nyi venchurno-innovatsionnyi kompleks: sredstvo i mekhanizm aktivizatsii NTP. Problemy rasshireniya khozyaistvennoi samostoyatel'nosti regiona, Krasnoyarsk, 1991, pp. 56—70.

2. Bogomolov V.A., Egorshev I.M. Nauchno-tekhnicheskie, proizvodstvennye i issledovatel'skie kompleksy v promyshlenno razvitykh kapitalisticheskikh stranakh. Problemy upravleniya ekonomikoi, Moscow, 1994, Issue. 19—20, pp. 39—53.

3. Gorkin A.P. Geografiya postindustrial'noi promyshlennosti (metodologiya i rezul'taty issledovanii, 1973—2012 gody), Smolensk, Oikumena, 2012, 348 p.

4. Gromeka V.I. SShA: nauchno-tekhnicheskii potentsial: sotsial'no-ekonomicheskie problemy formirovaniya i razviti ya / In-t SShA i Kanady AN SSSR, Moscow, Mysl', 1977. 245 p.

5. Zubarevich N.V. Razvitie rossiiskogo prostranstva: bar'ery i vozmozhnosti regional'noi politiki. Mir novoi ekonomiki, 2017, no 2, pp. 46—57.

6. Kurichev N.K. Prostranstvennoe razvitie promyshlennosti SShA i vneshnyaya torgovlya. Izvestiya RAN. Ser.: Geo graficheskaya, 2011, no 2, pp. 40—50.

7. Minat V.N. Gosudarstvennaya regional'naya politika i razvitie regional'nykh innovatsionnykh sistem v SshA. Feder alizm, 2020, vol. 25, no 4 (100), pp. 173—188. DOI: 10.21686/2073-1051-2020-4-173-188

8. Minat V.N. Innovatsionnaya deyatel'nost' i prostranstvennaya struktura obrabatyvayushchei promyshlennosti SShA. Innovatsii, 2020, no 10 (264), pp. 82—94. DOI: 10.26310/2071—3010.2020.264.10.010

9. Minat V.N. Mezhdunarodnoe sotrudnichestvo shtatov i raionov SShA v innovatsionnoi deyatel'nosti. Vestnik NGUEU, 2021, no 1, pp. 221—234. DOI: 10.34020/2073-6495-2021-1-221-234

10. Minat V.N. Osobennosti funktsionirovaniya regional'nykh innovatsionnykh sistem v shtatakh Severa SshA. Vestnik NGUEU, 2020, no 3, pp. 198—213. DOI: 10.34020/2073-6495-2020-3-198-213

11. Minat V.N. Evolyutsiya finansirovaniya promyshlennykh NIOKR v SShA: dinamicheskie i strukturnye osoben nosti. Vestnik Volgogradskogo gos. universiteta. Ekonomika, 2021, vol. 23, no 1. pp. 177—189. DOI: 10.15688/ek.jvolsu.2021.1.15

12. Glinskii V.V., Serga L.K., Kisel'nikov A.A., Khramtsova T.G. O napravleniyakh vozdeistviya territorial'noi differ entsiatsii na ekonomicheskii rost. Vestnik NGUEU, 2018, no 4, pp. 64—71.

13. Annual Survey of Manufactures (ASM). Wash., 2020. URL: https://catalog.data.gov/dataset/annual-survey-of manufactures (accessed 08.03.2021).

14. Bogge D.S. Spatial placement of innovations in the industrial sector of the American economy. The American Eco nomic Review, vol. 108, no 9. 2018, pp. 1214—1237.

15. Davidson M. Modern marketing and diffusion of innovations in the American industry of the North-East of the USA. Journal of Marketing Re-search, 2017. URL: https://www.researchgate.net/journal/0022-2437_Journal_ of_Marketing_Research (accessed 05.03.2021).

16. Guenther G. Federal funding for research and development in the Atlantic States. Issues for the 114th Congress, Congressional Research Service, 2015. URL: https://fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/RL211117.pdf (accessed 02.03.2021).

17. Jeffrey L.F., Michael E.P., Scott S. The determinants of national innovative capacity. Research Policy, 2002, vol. 31, iss. 6, pp. 899—933. URL: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0048733301001524

18. Meric S., Gertler D.A., Garkut D. No Place like Home? The Embed-dedness of Innovation in a Regional Economy. Review of International Political Economy, 2000, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 197—221.

19. National Science Foundation. National Science Board. Science and Engineering Indictors, 2020. URL: https://ncses.nsf.gov/pubs/nsb2020 (accessed 08.03.2021).

20. Research and Development in Industry. Wash., 2020. URL: https://www.encyclopedia.com/social-sciences-and law/economics-business-and-labor/businesses-and-occupations/industrial-research (accessed 08.03.2021).

21. Statistical Abstract of the United States, Wash., U. S. Government Printing Office, 2020. URL: https://books.google.ru/books?id=YkXjuVR9iN8C&hl=ru (accessed 08.03.2021).

22. Tucker B. Research and development in the US manufacturing industry: regional economic analysis. American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics, 2019, vol. 11, no 4, pp. 112—124.


Review

For citations:


Minat V.N. INNOVATIVE DEVELOPMENT OF THE USA INDUSTRY: A SPATIAL APPROACH. Territory Development. 2021;(2 (24)):26-35. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.32324/2412-8945-2021-2-26-35

Views: 728


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2412-8945 (Print)