Phenomena of Intermittency in Economics

The proposed study examines the concept of intermittency in the economic sphere and its impact on the processes of interaction between various sectors of the economy. The study of the phenomenon of intermittency represents an important contribution to understanding the dynamics of the economic system and its possible changes in the context of a rapidly changing and unstable global economic climate. The authors emphasize that understanding intermittency is necessary to develop effective resource management strategies, as well as to improve economic forecasting and planning and prevent potential crisis situations. The results of the work are based on the analysis of statistical data of the Russian Federation in the pre-crisis, crisis and post-crisis periods. One of the key problems with intermittency is its role in the transition to chaos. The purpose of the study is to determine the possibility of transition to crises in the economy through intermittency. Particular attention is paid to type III intermittency. In particular, the authors consider the possibility of modeling the entry into a crisis using the subcritical subharmonic Neumark — Saker bifurcation, as well as the supercritical Andronov — Hopf bifurcation. Numerical series of labor resources and investment volumes in the economy of the Russian Federation from 2000 to 2022 were used and analyzed in order to identify time periods during which alternating laminar and turbulent phases of economic development occur. Based on these data, using the least squares method, the parameters that determine the structure of bifurcations were found. Calculations of Floquet multipliers were made, which made it possible to evaluate the behavior of economic resources. The reasons that led to the occurrence of intermittency in certain periods are considered. The results of the study indicated the impossibility of sustainable economic development. The article also presents the most common negative consequences and a number of violations in the economy due to the appearance of intermittency, leading to the subcritical subharmonic Neumark — Saker bifurcation. Based on the results obtained, some approaches are proposed that can help in managing intermittency. The research carried out may be useful for the development of more accurate forecasting and planning models in the economic sphere.

1. Brock W.A. Chaos and Economics: Does the Butterfly Effect Apply? Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-2681(91)90006-9.

2. Chiarella C. et al. The Stochastic Dynamics of Speculative Prices. Available at: https://EconPapers.repec.org/ RePEc:uts:rpaper:208

3. Lux T. The Socio-Economic Dynamics of Speculative Markets: Interacting Agents, Chaos, and the Fat Tails of Return Distributions. Available at: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:jeborg:v:33:y:1998:i:2:p:143-165

4. Westerhoff F.H. Nonlinear Expectation Formation, Endogenous Business Cycles and Stylized Facts. Available at: https://researchgate.netpublication/24015803_Nonlinear_…

5. Faggini M. et al. Nonlinear Dynamics in Economics, Finance and the Social Sciences: Essays in Honour of John Barkley Rosser Jr. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-04023-8

6. Hayward T. Chaos theory, economics and information: The implications for strategic decision-making. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/235984049

7. Rosser Jr.J. B. Complex Ecologic-Economic Dynamics and Environmental Policy. Available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=294681 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.294681

8. Day R.H. Complex Economic Dynamics: Obvious in History, Generic in Theory, Elusive in Data. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jedc.2007.01.024.

9. Hommes C.H. Heterogeneous Agent Models in Economics and Finance. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/4982557

10. Assenza T. et al. Animal Spirits, Risk Premia, and Optimal Taylor Rules., SSRN. Available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2099350

11. Matrosov V.V., Shalfeev V.D. Modelirovanie jekonomicheskih i finansovyh ciklov: generacija i sinhronizacija [Modeling of economic and financial cycles: generation and synchronization], Izvestija vysshih uchebnyh zavedenij. Prikladnaja nelinejnaja dinamika [News of higher educational institutions. Applied nonlinear dynamics], 2021, vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 515-533.

12. Ahromeeva T.S., Kurdjumov S.P., Malineckij G.G., Samarskij A.A. Struktury i haos v nelinejnyh sredah [Structures and chaos in nonlinear media]. Moscow, FIZMATLIT, 2007, 488 p.

13. Evstifeev E.V., Moskalenko O.I. Primenenie metoda rascheta lokal'nyh pokazatelej Ljapunova dlja analiza harakteristik peremezhajushhejsja obobshhennoj sinhronizacii [Application of the method of calculating local Lyapunov exponents to analyze the characteristics of intermittent generalized synchronization], Problemy informatiki [Problems of Informatics], 2022, no. 2, pp. 5-15.

14. Kuznecov S.P. Dinamicheskij haos [Dynamic chaos]. Moscow, FIZMATLIT, 2001. 356 p.

15. Nguen T.T., Sboev D.S., Tkachenko V.V. Peremezhaemost' v pogranichnom sloe pri povyshennoj vneshnej turbulentnosti [Intermittency in the boundary layer with increased external turbulence], Trudy MFTI [Proceedings of MIPT], 2020, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 150-162.

16. Omorov R. O. Modal'naja chuvstvitel'nost', robastnost' i grubost' dinamicheskih sistem [Modal sensitivity, robustness and roughness of dynamic systems], Nauchno-tehnicheskij vestnik informacionnyh tehnologij, mehaniki i optiki [Scientific and technical bulletin of information technologies, mechanics and optics], 2021, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 179-189.

17. Ustinov M. V. Statisticheskoe opisanie peremezhaemosti v perehodnoj oblasti pri nizkoj stepeni turbulentnosti potoka [Statistical description of intermittency in the transition region at a low degree of flow turbulence], Izvestija RAN. Mehanika zhidkosti i gaza [Izvestiya RAS. Fluid and gas mechanics], 2020, no. 4, pp. 11-23.

18. Pomeau Y., Manneville P. Intermittent transition to turbulence in dissipative dynamical systems, Comm. Math. Phys., 1980, vol. 74, P. 189-197.

19. Platt N., Spiegel E.A., Tresser C. On-off intermittency: a mechanism for bursting, Phys. Rev. Lett., 1993, vol. 70, no. 3, pp. 279.

20. Pikovsky A.S., Osipov G.V., Rosenblum M.G., Zaks M., Kurths J. Attractorrepeller collision and eyelet intermittency at the transition to phase synchronization, Phys. Rev. Lett., 1997, vol. 79, no. 1, pp. 47.

21. Hramov A.E., Koronovskii A.A., Kurovskaya M.K., Boccaletti S. Ring intermittency in coupled chaotic oscillators at the boundary of phase synchronization, Phys. Rev. Lett, 2006, vol. 97, 114101.

22. Koronovskii A.A., Kurovskaya M.K., Moskalenko O.I., Hramov A., Boccaletti S. Self-similarity in explosive synchronization of complex networks, Phys. Rev. E., 2017, vol. 96, no. 6, pp. 062312. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevE.96.062312.

23. Balakin M.I., Ryskin N.M. Bifurkatsionnyy mekhanizm formirovaniya razvitoy mul'tistabil'nosti v ostsillyatore van der Polya s zapazdyvayushchey obratnoy svyaz'yu, Nelineynaya dinam., 2017, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 151-164.