ROLE OF SOCIAL CAPITAL IN STABILIZATION OF AUTOCRATIC REGIMES
https://doi.org/10.32324/2412-8945-2019-2-16-25
Abstract
The article examines the role and development of social capital in stabilizing autocratic regimes. The social capital in the study was operationalized as trust, since the presence of trust in society strengthens the network of relationships. Stability in this study refers to all changes in the political system, which are measured through indicators of political instability. At the same time, this paper considers cooptational and repressive management strategies, since the development of social capital in autocratic regimes directly depends on the choice of one of these strategies. The study sample lasting from 1981 to 2012 included 56 autocratic states. An empirical study revealed that the behavior of social capital in stabilizing autocratic regimes is non-linear and depends on the type of autocratic regime, as well as on the management strategy used.
Keywords
социальный капитал,
доверие,
политическая стабильность,
автократический режим,
стратегия управления,
кооптационная стратегия управления,
репрессивная стратегия управления,
social capital,
trust,
political stability,
autocratic regime,
management strategy,
co-optational management strategy,
repressive management strategy
About the Author
Z. T. Lukhmanova
Институт изучения проблем молодежи и подготовки перспективных кадров при Академии государственного управления при Президенте Республики Узбекистан
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
References
1. Вельцель К. Рождение свободы. М. : ВЦИОМ, 2017. 404 с.
2. Фукуяма Ф. Доверие: социальные добродетели и путь к процветанию. 5-9577-1416-Х изд. М. : ACT, 2004. 730 c.
3. Cheibub J. A., Gandhi J., Vreeland J. R. Democracy and Dictatorship Revisited // Public Choice. 2010. Vol. 143, N. 1-2. P. 67-101.
4. Cingranelli D. L., Richards D. L. The Cingranelli-Richards (CIRI) Human Rights Data Project. 2014. Coding Manual Version 5.20.14. URL: http://www.humanrightsdata.com/p/data-documentation.html (дата обращения: 19.01.2012).
5. CIRI. Cingranelli, David L. and David L. Richards. 2014. The Cingranelli-Richards (CIRI) Human Rights Data Project. Version: 5.20.14. URL: http ://www. humanrightsdata. com/p/data-documentation.html (дата обращения: 19.01.2017).
6. CNTS. Cross-National Time Series Data Archive Coverage. Databank International. 2016. (legislative process data, electoral process data). URL: http://www.databanksinternational.com (дата обращения: 20.01.2017).
7. Magaloni B., Kricheli R. Political Order and One-Party Rule // Annual review of political science. 2010. Vol. 13, No.10. P. 123-143.
8. Olsen J. P., March J. G. Elaborating the New Institutionalism // The Oxford hand book Political Institution. Oxford University Press. 2005. P. 3-23.
9. Polity IV. URL: http://www.systemicpeace.org/ polity/polity4.htm (дата обращения: 19.05.2016).
10. Russell J. D., Klingemann H. Social Capital // The Oxford Handbook of Political Behavior. NY : Oxford University Press. 2009. P. 1-15.
11. Wilson K. User’s Manual. Cross-National Time-Series Data Archive. Jerusalem : Databanks International. 2017.
12. Wintrobe R. Dictatorship: Analytical Approaches // In The oxford handbook of comparative politics. 2009. P. 364-395.
13. World Bank. GDP, PPP (constant 2011 international $), CIRI. URL: http://data.worldbank.org/ indicator/NY.GDP.MKTP.PP.KD (дата обращения: 20.02.2017).
14. WVS: World Values Survey. (МИЦ: Мировое исследование ценностей). URL: http://www.worldvaluessurvey.org (дата обращения: 22.11.2016).
Review
For citations:
Lukhmanova Z.T. ROLE OF SOCIAL CAPITAL IN STABILIZATION OF AUTOCRATIC REGIMES. Territory Development. 2019;(2):16-25. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.32324/2412-8945-2019-2-16-25
Views:
133
Email this article 