Technological Independence in Globalization: Strategies, Challenges and Prospects
EDN: JLNCJT
Abstract
This article analyzes the transformation of international interactions in foreign trade and technology exchange under globalization. It explores the mechanisms by which countries transition from global integration to partial technological independence, driven by political and economic challenges. Particular attention is paid to the concepts of protectionism and industrial policy as tools for achieving competitiveness and innovative development. The article analyzes cases of leading economies demonstrating a balance between technological interdependence and the desire for autonomy in strategic sectors. It concludes that a selective approach to regulating international economic relations and technological cooperation is necessary.
Keywords
Supporting agencies: This study was conducted as part of the Ufa Federal Research Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences' state assignment No. 075-00571-25-00 for 2025 and the planning period of 2026 and 2027.
About the Authors
S. G. Marichev
Institute of Social and Economic Research, Ufa Scientific Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Sergey G. Marichev — Candidate of Economic Sciences, Senior Researcher, Laboratory of Contemporary Problems of Regional Economics
Ufa
I. U. Zulkarnay
Institute of Social and Economic Research, Ufa Scientific Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Ildar U. Zulkarnay — Doctor of Economics, Head of the Laboratory of Contemporary Problems of Regional Economics
Ufa
References
1. Khrustalev E.Yu., Larin S.N., Khrustalev O.E. Vliyaniye protektsionizma na innovatsionnoye razvitiye v krizisnykh usloviyakh [The Influence of Protectionism on Innovative Development in Crisis Conditions], Mezhdunarodnyy zhurnal gumanitarnykh i yestestvennykh nauk [International Journal of Humanities and Natural Sciences], 2021, no. 9–1, pp. 191–196. DOI: 10.24412/2500-1000-2021-9-1-191-196
2. Bodnarchuk T.L. Analiz sovremennykh tendentsiy razvitiya protektsionizma v kontekste trayektorii predshestvuyushchego razvitiya [Analysis of Modern Trends in the Development of Protectionism in the Context of the Trajectory of Previous Development], Voprosy upravleniya [Management Issues], 2014, no. 1 (7), pp. 57–62.
3. Yelsukov M.Yu., Barsbold B.M. Politika gosudarstvennogo protektsionizma v stranakh s razlichnym urovnem ekonomicheskogo razvitiya [State Protectionism Policy in Countries with Different Levels of Economic Development], Upravlencheskoye kon-sultirovaniye [Management Consulting], 2018, no. 8 (116), pp. 8–19. DOI: 10.22394/1726-1139-2018-8-8-19
4. Minakova I.V., Masalov E.I., Levshakova S.R., Shchukina D.A. Revansh gosudarstvennoy politiki protektsionizma v sovremennoy ekonomike [The Comeback of State Protectionism Policy in the Modern Economy], Region: sistemy, ekonomika, upravleniye [Region: Systems, Economics, Management], 2024, no. 2 (65), pp. 27–36. DOI: 10.22394/1997-4469-2024-65-2-27-36
5. Grinberg R.S., Komolov O.O. Politika protektsionizma v Rossii: novyye tendentsii v kontekste problemy importa [Protectionism Policy in Russia: New Trends in the Context of the Import Problem], Ekonomicheskiye i sotsialnyye peremeny: fakty, tendentsii, prognoz [Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecasts], 2022, no. 15 (2), pp. 44–54.
6. Autor David, David Dorn, Gordon Hanson. When Work Disappears: Manufacturing Decline and the Falling Marriage-Market Value of Men, American Economic Review: In-sights, 2019, vol. 1 (2), pp. 161–78.
7. Zulkarnay I.U., Islakayeva G.R., Kolonskikh L.R. i dr. Upravleniye ekonomikoy neftekhimicheskogo regiona v usloviyakh globalnykh vyzovov [Managing the Economy of a Petrochemical Region Under Global Challenges], Ufa, 2024, 320 p.
8. Kenzhebayeva M.T. Osnovnyye podkhody k opredeleniyu promyshlennoy politiki [Main Approaches to Defining Industrial Policy], Vestnik KazNU. Seriya ekonomicheskaya [KazNU Bulletin. Economic Series], 2011, vol. 83, no. 1, pp. 7–12.
9. Afanasyev A.A. Sushchnost i struktura mekhanizma realizatsii promyshlennoy politiki [The Essence and Structure of the Mechanism for Implementing Industrial Policy], Finansovyye rynki i banki [Financial Markets and Banks], 2021, no. 11, pp. 101–106.
10. Petrov M.V. Promyshlennaya politika kak napravleniye ekonomicheskoy strategii gosudarstva [Industrial Policy as a Direction of the State's Economic Strategy], Ekonomika, predprinimatelstvo i pravo [Economics, Entrepreneurship and Law], 2022, vol. 12, no. 8, pp. 2117–2134. DOI: 10.18334/epp.12.8.116124.
11. Rodrik D. Industrial Policy for the Twenty-First Century, SSRN Electronic Journal, 2004. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.617544.
12. Wade R. Governing The Market: Economic Theory and the Role of Government in East Asian Industrialization, 2003, 230 p.
13. Chang H.-J. Kicking Away the Ladder: Development Strategy in Historical Perspective. London, 2002, 310 p.
14. Orlova M.E. Opyt ekonomicheskoy modernizatsii Irlandii [The Experience of Ireland's Economic Modernization], Zhurnal politicheskoy filosofii i sotsiologii politiki “Politiya. Analiz. Khronika Prognoz” [Journal of Political Philosophy and Sociology of Politics “Politiya. Analysis. Chronicle. Forecast”], 2010, no. 3–4 (58–59), pp. 75–86.
15. Glazyev S.Yu. «Vashingtonskiy konsensus» i nauchno-tekhnicheskiy progress v Rossii [The “Washington Consensus” and Scientific and Technological Progress in Russia], Ekonomicheskaya nauka sovremennoy Rossii (Prilozheniye) [Economic Science of Modern Russia (Supplement)], 1998, pp. 39–46.
16. Schaefer B., Johnson B. IMF Reform? Setting the Record Straight Heritage Foundation. Available at: https://www.heritage.org/report/imf-reform-setting-the-record-straight (accessed: 06.05.2025).
17. Prisekin A.A. Protivostoyaniye “vashingtonskogo” i “pekinskogo” konsensusov kak popytka rasshireniya zony vliyaniya na mirovoy arene [The Confrontation Between the “Washington” and “Beijing” Consensuses as an Attempt to Expand the Zone of Influence on the World Stage], Sotsialno-gumanitarnyye znaniya [Social and Humanity Knowledge], 2022, no. 1, pp. 273–276.
18. Airbus zayavil o neobkhodimosti pomoshchi YeS dlya sozdaniya novykh laynerov [Airbus Announced the Need for EU Assistance to Create New Airliners]. Available at: https://www.rbc.ru/business/05/12/2023/656f08b59a79476b5032c05a?utm_source
19. Mikhaylov V.S., Islakayeva G.R. Spetsifichnyye dlya Rossii neformalnyye instituty, tormozyashchiye razvitiye innovatsionnogo predprinimatelstva [Informal Institutions Specific to Russia that Hinder the Development of Innovative Entrepreneurship], Ekonomika i upravleniye [Economics and Management], nauch.-prakt. zhurn., 2025, no. 3 (183), pp. 63–67. DOI: 10.34773/EU.2025.3.11. EDN LTNLFD.
20. Zulkarnay I.U., Islakayeva G.R., Ishmukhametov N.S. i dr. Intensivnoye lesopolzovaniye v Rossiyskoy Federatsii: institutsionalnyye prepyatstviya i neobkhodimyye reform [Intensive Forest Management in the Russian Federation: Institutional Obstacles and Necessary Reforms], Ufa, Bashk. gos. un-t, 2017, 168 p.
Review
For citations:
Marichev S.G., Zulkarnay I.U. Technological Independence in Globalization: Strategies, Challenges and Prospects. Territory Development. 2025;(4 (42)):44-53. (In Russ.) EDN: JLNCJT
Views:
27
Email this article 